|
The Rottnest Society Home About Us Objectives Committee Join Contact Us News Tree planting Weeding Archives Policies Comment Quiz
19 May 2009 REVIEW THE ACT - or - REALIGN THE RIMP with the CURRENT ACT URGENT ACTION REQUIRED -WHAT YOU CAN DO! The draft Rottnest Island Management Plan 2009-2014 (RIMP) was released for public comment on 26th February 2009. The public comment period closed at 5 pm on 5th May. Read our submission here. The draft RIMP pre-empts a proposed review of the Act EITHER the Act should be reviewed and amended if that is what Western Australians want OR the draft RIMP should be realigned with the Act as it currently is. The Rottnest Society has asked the Minister for Tourism to delay progressing the RIMP until the Act is reviewed. Read our letter to the Minister here and our Press Release on this matter here. There is much that is commendable about this draft plan... ...BUT the Rottnest Society believes that the draft RIMP should be NOT be accepted as it is. The overall direction of this draft management plan is no longer aligned with the Rottnest Island Authority Act 1987. In our view that is a very serious matter indeed. The Act and the RIMP are our most important safeguards...read more at 'Functions and Powers' as required by the Act. Of particular importance to the public are the purposes for which the island is managed. The current RIMP continues until a new plan is gazetted. To date the island has largely been managed in accordance with the requirements of the Act. However this draft RIMP sets out a plan for a serious divergence from the purpose for which the island is managed, as required by the Act, in that it presents a major drive to become a tourist destination - as distinct from a local holiday and recreation destination. A number of the yet-to-be-developed strategies proposed in the draft appear to be designed to underpin this management direction. Further, a number of the accommodation developments proposed appear to be designed to provide accommodation deemed suitable for tourists. Aligned with this there appears to be a move to somehow modify the island culture to make it a more acceptable tourist destination. The public knows that there is a difference between 'holiday and recreation' and 'eco-tourism' - they are not the same thing. Further, the Rottnest Society, believes that the draft RIMP is fundamentally flawed in that a number of the initiatives are not sufficiently developed for the public to make informed comment or for the RIA to make appropriate management decisions. And several development proposals have insufficient information for informed comment. Also a key visitor impact research project should be completed so that its results can be taken into account in the development of these initiatives. The draft RIMP's Initiative 1 proposes a review of the Act and includes a possible change for the RIA to a Government Trading Enterprise model. Other amendments to the Act have been proposed over the years so it is timely to carry out a review. However such a review could take years to get through the Parliament. We see two possible options: Review the Act first - or realign the RIMP with the current Act The draft RIMP proposed a number of accommodation developments in the settlement area - with far too little information about them for us to be able to make informed comment. These proposals include:
Recently Rottnest Island Authority Chairman, Laurie O'Meara, wrote in the Rottnest Islander, 'Today's "Newlook Rottnest Island" is likely to undergo even further dramatic changes over the next five years under the just-released draft Management Plan 2009-2014' (emphasis ours). The Chairman is right! If all of the above developments go ahead over the next five years it might mean:
An additional 600-900 hotel beds (based on 100 rooms/200-300 beds each)... ...There are 247 hotel beds on the island currently
Any development planning approval process must take into account the CUMULATIVE impact of such developments. How can this be ensured?
READ THE FULL LIST OF THE ROTTNEST SOCIETY'S CONCERNS about the draft RIMP here:
|
DELAY THE MT HERSCHEL HOTEL... The Rottnest Society has also written to the Minister for Tourism asking that she delay any further progress of a hotel at Mt Herschel. The original Mt Herschel hotel plan could not be said to have a 'low impact on the landscape'. Nor was it 'consistent with the scale and contour of the natural landscape'. Any hotel to be built on this site should meet updated building and sustainability guidelines - and should not be approved until those guidelines are approved and in place. The planning process did not conform to the Act and the RIMP. Read our letter to the Minister here to see why we took this step. As of February 2009 the negotiations with Broadwater Consortium to build a hotel at Mt Herschel have ended. The RIA intends to seek another interested proponent to build this hotel. However a number of questions we sought answers to have never been answered. We have recently asked for answers and to date have received none on this matter (see 'Supplementary questions'). The public deserves answers before another proponent is signed up. Original images of the Broadwater concept plan can be found at HOTEL AT MT HERSCHEL The RIA's Sustainability Guidelines say: 'It is important that the future development on Rottnest Island does not detract from the beauty of its natural and cultural landscape. It is envisioned that any development will blend into the surrounding environment as much as possible, allowing visitors to enjoy the Islands natural and cultural values. 4.1 Guidelines 4.1.1 To retain the value of the Rottnest Island landscape, only those developments which have a low impact on the landscape and are consistent with the scale and contour of the natural landscape, will be approved. 4.1.2 The height of new structures or additions to existing structures should conform to Rottnest Island Authority Building Guidelines' And the RIA Building Guidelines say: 'No new structure or additions to be higher than the tree line at Thomson Bay.' See whether you think the Mt Herschel Hotel meets these criteria... The draft RIMP also proposes a feasibility study of a marina in South Thomson - without any indication of size or number of pens...see images. |
|||||||||